A construction company has been fined £12,000 after a bricklayer fell through a stairwell opening and fractured his skull.
Scott Ife, from Bridgnorth, Shropshire, was working for 2 Counties Construction (Midlands) when the incident happened on 8 June 2020.
The company had been hired as the principal contractor overseeing the refurbishment of agricultural barns into houses on Humber Lane in Telford.
Ife, who was 27 at the time, was laying the blocks to form the gable walls for a two-storey extension alongside another employee. The pair set up a working platform using Youngman boards on the first floor of the property. As there was an unprotected stairwell opening in the property, one end of the Youngman boards was unsupported.
While leaning over to point up the blocks in the gable walls, Ife lost his balance before falling onto the unsupported Youngman boards and through the stairwell opening.
Ife fell 4.5m onto the concrete floor below, fracturing his skull and damaging his facial nerve. He was hospitalised for three days following the incident.
A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation identified several failings on the part of 2 Counties Construction (Midlands) Ltd. These included a lack of suitable controls for preventing falls into the building and through the stairwell openings.
It also found there was inadequate planning and a lack of selection of equipment for working at height. The site management arrangements were also found to be inadequate.
An incident that ‘should have been easily avoided’
2 Counties Construction (Midlands) Ltd, of Taylors Lane, Broomhall, Worcester, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 13(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.
The company was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay £4,139 in costs at Cannock Magistrates’ Court on 21 July 2023.
HSE inspector David Brassington said: “This incident could and should have been easily avoided. Work at height needs to be properly planned and managed to ensure that appropriate precautions are used.
“We are fortunate that the injuries resulting from these failings were not more serious.”
This prosecution was supported by HSE enforcement lawyer Nathan Cook.
Comments
Comments are closed.
How negligent was the brick layer and were RAMS countersigned and followed?