Opinion

China’s quiet, pervasive role in UK construction needs to be understood

We don’t need a more alarmist conversation about China in construction, we need a more accurate one.

We don’t need a more alarmist conversation about China in construction, we need a more accurate one.
The question of material independence from China is premature if project teams don’t understand their own supply chains, writes Leon Li. Image: Dragos Daniel Iliescu/Dreamstime

Europe’s debate about de-risking when it comes to China’s central role in global manufacturing usually centres on things we can easily see and identify: electric vehicles, batteries, telecoms, semiconductors and large infrastructure projects.

But in the day-to-day delivery of buildings and infrastructure in the UK and Europe, China’s input is pervasive in a way that doesn’t make headlines.

If you know where to look, you’ll find it in materials, systems and components that enter supply chains through complex subcontracting routes.

For designers, contractors and project managers, this is not an abstract geopolitical issue. It’s how projects are specified, priced and delivered.

Multi-layered and fluid

As a Chinese architect now based in Spain, I saw this first-hand when the company I co-founded, Shenzhen Yidu Architectural Technology, carried out the design of lighting and smart building systems for La Mega Place, an exhibition and event venue near Paris, in 2021. We provided the related lighting and smart-control products.

Another Chinese team did the interior design and, from my understanding, a large share of the interior fit-out materials were sourced from Chinese supply chains.

A building project is not like a single strategic technology purchase. It’s a multi-layered and often fluid process.

One consultant may specify a performance requirement; a contractor may propose an equivalent product; a subcontractor may source a system through a distributor; and a project manager may approve a substitution because it keeps the programme moving.

By the time a component reaches site, its origin may be several steps removed from the public identity of the project.

This is one reason why, as it stands, the simple language of dependence or independence can’t apply to construction.

From facades to finishes

It’s important to understand the breadth of what we’re talking about. The following is just a partial list of Chinese-origin materials, components and systems that appear without fanfare in European supply chains.

Facade and external-envelope systems: Chinese facade contractors such as Yuanda Europe and Lingyun Facade UK provide project-level examples. Yuanda Europe’s listed scope on projects such as Hadid Tower in Milan, Harbour Central and One Nine Elms in London includes curtain walling, GRC rainscreen cladding, glazed terracotta tiles, aluminium panels, louvres, glazed balustrades, steel bolt-on balconies and architectural steelwork.

Volumetric modular building systems: CIMC Modular Building Systems is a Chinese modular-building supplier delivering hotel, student-accommodation and residential projects, including Park View Student Village in Newcastle, Hampton by Hilton Bristol Airport, Premier Inn Gatwick and Travelodge Heathrow. This is less a single product than a complete construction-delivery system.

Photovoltaic glass and BIPV materials: The 800t-per-day ultra-clear rolled photovoltaic glass production line in Turkey, built under a general contract by China Triumph International Engineering, is an example of Chinese standards, technology and equipment entering the regional PV glass supply chain. Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPVs) also turn solar products into building materials, including roof and facade systems.

Aluminium extrusions: These are used in curtain walls, windows, doors, facade systems, louvres and other building components. EU trade measures against aluminium extrusions from China show that this is a recognised construction-supply-chain category rather than just a theoretical example.

Ceramic wall and floor tiles: This is a finishing material category rather than a single project example, but EU anti-dumping measures against Chinese ceramic wall and floor tiles show that Chinese-origin finishing materials have long been part of the European building products market.

SPC, LVT and PVC flooring: Chinese manufacturers in places such as Changzhou supply rigid-core vinyl flooring, SPC flooring and related interior floor products to distributors, brand owners and project contractors in Europe and other markets. This is a good example of an interior material category that is often invisible at the public-policy level.

Rock wool and glass wool: Chinese insulation manufacturers supply rock and glass wool products for external wall systems, curtain-wall systems, fire protection, acoustic insulation and industrial uses. This is another category where the material is not politically visible, but is relevant to actual project delivery.

Paints, coatings and coating inputs: Titanium dioxide is a major pigment used in paints and coatings. Chinese imports into Europe have become visible enough to trigger EU trade measures. It shows how Chinese supply can enter construction through upstream materials used by European coating manufacturers.

The point here is that Chinese-made goods can enter construction through many different layers – interior fit-out, lighting and controls, facade systems, modular buildings, PV glass, aluminium profiles, tiles, flooring, insulation, steel components, coatings and site equipment.

They’re chosen not for political reasons, but because they’re available, technically acceptable and competitive.

Understanding before independence

The question of material independence from China is premature if project teams don’t understand their own supply chains.

Where are the critical components coming from? Which products have limited alternatives? Which substitutions introduce technical or maintenance risks? And which supply routes are exposed to tariffs, shipping delays, certification problems or political pressure?

In construction, risk hides in unglamorous components rather than flagship technologies.

If a contractor relies on a particular imported component because it’s cheaper or faster to obtain, that may be rational on one project.

But if many projects quietly make the same choice, the sector as a whole may develop a dependency that is not measured or debated. The dependency is not always dramatic, but it can still matter when global events constrict supply.

Chinese manufacturing capacity is part of the global construction economy. It has helped reduce costs, expand product availability and support delivery in sectors such as renewables, building services and industrial construction.

It’s a project-level discipline

If it’s to mean anything in construction, de-risking has to become a project-level discipline: mapping suppliers, understanding alternatives, assessing substitution risk and making procurement decisions with greater clarity.

The people who really know where materials come from are not policymakers. They are quantity surveyors, procurement managers, contractors, designers, site managers and engineers.

Europe and the UK do not need a more alarmist conversation about China in construction. They need a more accurate one.

The real story is not that China is taking over European building sites. It is that Chinese industrial capacity is already woven into many of the ordinary decisions that make construction possible.

That reality deserves to be understood before it becomes a problem.

Leon Li obtained the title of senior engineering professional in architectural design in China in 2017. He served for years as head of the Chengdu branch of Xiamen Fanhua Architectural Design Co Ltd. Based now in Barcelona, he conducts independent research into infrastructure, procurement, energy transition and China-Europe industrial links.

Story for CM? Get in touch via email: [email protected]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest articles in Opinion