Construction Management is the highest circulation construction-based publication serving the UK built environment.
People
The construction gender gap is a leadership problem
Yanmo Adetula Director, Chayil Consulting
The lack of women in leadership roles is not a pipeline issue, argues Yanmo Adetula. The truth is more nuanced.
Image: Dreamstime
The construction industry has spent years talking about the gender gap. Conferences, panels and initiatives all point to the same conclusion: we need more women in construction.
That explanation is true, yet incomplete.
The real issue is not attracting women into the industry – it is what happens after they arrive.
Women make up around 15% of the UK construction workforce, according to CITB, yet representation at the senior leadership level remains significantly lower. If the problem were purely a pipeline issue, we would have seen a significant change by now. We have not.
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
The truth is more uncomfortable. The leadership gender gap persists because leadership is defined, developed, and rewarded in ways that reinforce gender stereotypes.
Here are seven reasons why.
1. Leadership is still confused with technical competence Construction continues to promote its strongest technical performers into leadership roles, assuming they will naturally become effective people leaders. They rarely do without support.
2. Leadership development is often overlooked In many organisations, leadership training is reactive. Managers receive support only after problems arise, when poor habits are already embedded.
3. The industry rewards one leadership style Historically, construction has prioritised authority and control while neglecting collaborative, social and emotionally intelligent leadership styles.
4. Poor leadership is tolerated for too long Project delivery often takes priority over behaviour, allowing ineffective leadership practices to continue unchecked.
5. Career progression lacks transparency Progression into leadership roles is often unclear, informal and influenced by visibility rather than structured capability.
6. Managers are not equipped to develop others Many managers lack the skills to coach and grow their teams, slowing the progression of diverse talent.
7. The problem is described as diversity, not performance The gender leadership gap is treated as a diversity issue rather than a core business risk linked to productivity and retention.
So what needs to change? Five solutions the industry can no longer ignore
1. Redefine leadership as a core business capability Leadership should be approached with the same rigour as safety or project delivery. This involves clearly defining what good leadership looks like across the organisation and embedding it into performance expectations. Competency frameworks must extend beyond technical delivery to include communication, people management and decision-making skills. When leadership is measured effectively, it becomes a priority rather than an afterthought.
2. Introduce structured and early leadership development Waiting until someone becomes a manager is too late. Organisations need to identify high-potential individuals earlier and start developing their leadership skills before promotion. This includes practical training, real-life application, and ongoing support. Early investment creates confident leaders ready to meet the challenges of managing people in complex settings.
3. Implement inclusive leadership development programmes Inclusive leadership must be deliberately cultivated. Organisations should intentionally create programmes that foster leaders capable of leading diverse teams, establishing psychologically safe environments, and recognising various strengths. This involves tackling bias in decision-making, strengthening communication styles, and preparing leaders to promote progression for underrepresented groups. When inclusion is embedded in leadership development, it bolsters both culture and performance.
4. Hold leaders accountable for behaviour, not simply results If poor leadership persists, then nothing will change. Organisations must introduce clear accountability measures that evaluate leadership behaviour alongside project results. This could include 360-degree feedback, team engagement metrics and leadership performance reviews. When leaders realise that how they lead is as important as what they deliver, behaviours start to change.
5. Create clear and visible pathways to leadership Progression should not depend on who is seen or who speaks the loudest. Organisations need transparent pathways that clearly specify what is required to advance into leadership roles. This includes specific criteria, development opportunities and access to mentoring or sponsorship. When people understand how to progress, they are more likely to stay, engage and invest in their own development.
The construction industry does not lack capable women, it lacks leadership systems that consistently develop and retain them.
If the sector is serious about change, it must move past surface-level conversations and address the root cause of leadership capability.
Organisations that act on this now will not only close the leadership gap but also outperform those that do not.
This is not a first step towards a paywall. We need readers to register with us to help sustain creation of quality editorial content on Construction Management. Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings. Thank you.
