‘No evidence’ Japanese knotweed damages structures, Aecom says

Images: Wikimedia Commons/H Zell

There’s no evidence that Japanese knotweed causes significant structural damage, according to a new study by Aecom and the University of Leeds.

The pair carried out research assessing the potential of the plant (fallopia japonica) to cause structural damage compared to other plants.

The non-native species is widely believe to pose a significant risk to buildings that are within seven metres of the above-ground portions of the plant, due to its underground shoots, or rhizomes.

The authors assessed the three main mechanisms by which plants are known to cause structural damage: subsidence; collapse and impact (usually caused by trees falling on buildings) and accumulating pressure due to growth (usually caused by the plant’s main trunk and secondary thickening of the roots in close proximity to the trunk).

Their survey of 51 contractors and 71 surveyors, reporting on 122 properties where Japanese knotweed was present, showed that reports of defects or structural damage to residential properties were rare.

A case study looked at 68 pre-1900 residential properties located on three streets in northern England, chosen because they had been abandoned for at least ten years, were already in a state of disrepair, and so represented a ‘worst case’ scenario in terms of susceptibility to damage from unchecked plant growth.

While knotweed was identified within seven metres of 18 of the properties, it was linked to less damage than the trees, climbers and shrubs (such as buddleia, which is also non-native and invasive in the UK) also found there.

In a separate survey, of 26 contractors who provided records of 81 excavations, results showed that Japanese knotweed rhizomes rarely extended more than 4m from above-ground plants. Rhizome spread was generally less than 2.5m – well below 7m.

When identified in homebuyers’ surveys, mortgage lenders often require evidence that a treatment programme is in place to control Japanese knotweed, entailing significant expense for sellers. The stigma associated with the plant means that property values can be affected, even after action is taken to control it.

Dr Mark Fennell, principal ecologist at Aecom, who led the research, said: “Our research sought to broaden existing knowledge about the risk to buildings of Japanese knotweed compared to other plants.

“We found nothing to suggest that Japanese knotweed causes significant damage to buildings – even when it is growing in close proximity – and certainly no more damage than other species that are not subject to such strict lending policies.”

He added that the so-called "seven metre rule" that requires treatment of the plant if it is closer than seven metres away from a building was not a statistically robust tool for estimating how far the plant’s rhizomes are likely to reach underground.

Co-author Dr Karen Bacon, from the University of Leeds’ School of Geography, said: “The negative impact of Japanese knotweed on such factors as biodiversity and flooding risks remains a cause for concern.

“But this plant poses less of a risk to buildings and other structures than many woody species, particularly trees. Japanese knotweed is capable of damaging built structures, but where this occurs, it is usually because an existing weakness or defect has been exacerbated.”

Professor Max Wade, technical director – ecology at Aecom, and co-author of the paper, said: “We hope our research will inform discussions around the advice currently offered about Japanese knotweed by providing more information about the reality of its impact on built structures.”