To improve BIM adoption and accelerate take-up of digital construction, the industry needs to remove jargon, and focus on collaboration and greater interoperability of technology. Those are the key conclusions to draw from readers’ responses to the latest annual Construction Management and BIMplus survey.
We asked respondents: what one change to process or one technology introduced to their operation could improve their approach to, or the results from, BIM and digital construction?
Dumping jargon and acronyms figured strongly among responses. “We work in an old-fashioned industry and constantly-developing and -changing terminology and processes are putting most colleagues I work with off adopting a BIM mindset and instead are just sticking to what they know,” said one respondent.
Another said: “Encourage conversations on BIM to occur in ‘human’ language rather than ‘tech talk’ and acronyms.”
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
To improve BIM adoption, another succinctly called for “simplicity and common sense”.
Collaboration and engagement
Focusing on collaboration was also seen as a key way to improve BIM adoption. One respondent said: “Culture of collaboration – tech is relatively easy; sharing is more complicated. All stakeholders need to be consulted from the beginning.”
Another echoed that statement: “Engage with representatives of all teams, even if they appear to be irrelevant.”
Also popular among respondents was a need to ensure greater and simpler interoperability of technology. One said: “Common data platforms – too much conflicting software that doesn’t gel.”
Another offered more detail: “Get software developers to standardise on a single common data environment technology upon which they build their vertical solutions. Too much project data when pushed into the cloud from on-premise server estates is dispersed now.”
There were also calls for more case studies of the benefits of the implementation of BIM, and for clients to drive BIM. Of the latter, one respondent said: “It’s back to clients investing to save in the medium to long term by stipulating the ISO 19650 management information and requirements in the contract to the design team and the principal contractor, together with ensuring monitoring of this data captured through the project stages, from inception through to completion of the asset and then during the lifecycle of the asset. It’s that simple.”
Are clients driving BIM adoption?
In the last year, on what proportion of your projects has BIM been driven by the client?
Half of the respondents said 25% or fewer of their projects in the last year featured BIM being driven by the client. Less than a fifth of respondents said the vast majority of their projects featured the client driving BIM.
One respondent said: “Not enough clients understand the benefits of BIM. This is mostly due to main contractors being in control of BIM instead of the employer clients. Too many client project managers have little understanding of BIM still. It’s just a paper exercise for them and they don’t manage the BIM process properly.”
An architect gave this insight into their experience: “Most clients mandate BIM Level 2 or PAS 1192 standards compliance now. Few are driving ISO 19650 implementation, but both we, and the larger contractors we work with, are driving 19650 for new projects.”
Sticking with clients, more than a quarter of respondents said they are often or very often required to hand over digital asset data upon completion of a project.
Supply chain in focus
Are you satisfied with the information management process within your supply chain and client base?
Opening the focus wider, we asked our respondents how satisfied they were with the information management processes within their supply chain as well as their client base. The vast majority (69%) said they were not satisfied.
One respondent offered: “Getting everyone to buy into the concepts and benefits of BIM remains difficult, and PAS 1192 is harder. ISO 19650 is likely to be much more difficult as it is very process-driven and puts a big onus on the Appointing Party and the Lead Appointed Party to make it work. They need to know the processes and engage with them at a granular level to gain the benefits.”
Another said: “With a greater degree of our clients looking to embrace asset management in the residential sector (in response to the golden thread), we have experienced a lack of ‘maturity’ with some suppliers/supply chain partners in providing consistent and compliant data.”
How prepared are you for the golden thread?
And thus we reach Dame Judith Hackitt’s golden thread. It’s pleasing to report that 59% of respondents are either prepared for it or have made preparations for it. A quarter said they have made no preparations.
One respondent, who has made some preparations for the golden thread, aired this warning: “Not enough organisations or people understand what this is let alone are engaging with it. There needs to be more publicity and promotion of the benefits of the golden thread, with specific case studies highlighting the cost benefits for clients.”
Respondents were drawn from across the supply chain:
This is not a first step towards a paywall. We need readers to register with us to help sustain creation of quality editorial content on Construction Management. Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings. Thank you.
