A large-scale cladding fire could not have happened had Building Regulations, British Standards and statutory guidance been followed and enforced “with reasonable diligence”, a lawyer for the government has told the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

The Grenfell Tower disaster was “the predictable yet unintended consequence of the combination of the laudable desire to reduce carbon emissions coupled with an unbridled passion for deregulation”.

The construction industry developed modern methods of construction more quickly than the London fire service’s ability to understand them in terms of fire spread.

The theatre production about the Grenfell Tower Inquiry puts the built environment sector and all its murkiest machinations in the spotlight.

A government adviser told fire and rescue services that there was “insufficient information” to warrant an alert to housing authorities over the risks of certain types of cladding following the 2009 Lakanal House fire in London.

A failure of the regulatory system over decades and the “cynical and cavalier” attitude of cladding and insulation manufacturers were the main causes of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, the barrister for main contractor Rydon has told the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

Arconic, the manufacturer of the Reynobond PE cladding used during the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower, and insulation manufacturers Celotex and Kingspan have all sought to deny responsibility for the Grenfell Tower fire in closing submissions given to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

The barrister acting for victims of the Grenfell Tower disaster has accused contractors and professionals in charge of the building of “wilful non-compliance”.

The external walls of Grenfell Tower should have been checked during a fire risk assessment of the building after its refurbishment, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry has heard.

Key moments from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry are to be dramatised in a run of verbatim theatre performances later this year.

Exactly four years on from the Grenfell Tower disaster, on 14 June 2017, CM looks back on the key events that have happened since

The fire risk assessor at Grenfell Tower added post-nominals to his name for professional registrations he did not have or did not exist.

It was not “sensible” for combustible aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding to be used on a tall building like Grenfell Tower, even if it might have been interpreted that it was “allowed” under Building Regulations at the time, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry has heard.

A selection of readers’ comments about news and issues in the industry from www.constructionmanagement.co.uk

Paul Morrell explains to CM why, amid the uncomfortable revelations coming out of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, the construction industry needs to rally to fix problems wherever they are discovered.

Construction dust and debris generated during the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower may have contaminated an “essential” fire control switch.

Lawyers for the victims of the Grenfell Tower disaster have accused the council of ignoring residents’ fire safety concerns.

The British Board of Agrément (BBA) reported its suspicions that it may have been misled by Arconic to the Met Police, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry has heard.