The CITB has a last chance to reform and start facilitating quality training en masse among the construction industry’s smaller firms, according to the Federation of Master Builders (FMB).
The FMB today announced its qualified support for the CITB as part of the Consensus process, submitting its official letter to the CITB’s chief executive Sarah Beale.
Brian Berry, chief executive of the FMB, said that his members were divided regarding the future of CITB – some want to see it continue and others want to see it abolished – but all agree that it is not currently working for the industry’s smaller firms.
Berry maintains that while the FMB has decided to give its support for the continuation of the levy, it should not to be interpreted as support for the status quo.
“The CITB is broken and we must all pitch in to ensure we fix it,” he said. “The stakes couldn’t be higher because unless we get this right, the construction skills crisis will continue to worsen and the government will be unable to meet its ambitious house building and infrastructure objectives.”
Read related articles
- Civil engineers back CITB, but want reforms
- Balfour Beatty changes its mind on CITB vote
- CLC and BAM Nuttall chief executive back CITB
While the FMB has chosen to support the training body it has been revealed that the backing only passed by one vote. A total of 163 FMB members voted – around 4% of the 4,000 eligible members, with 82 firms (50.3%) voting in support of the CITB’s levy and 81 (49.7%) voting against.
Berry continued: “Crucial to the future success of the CITB is a review of its governance structure. It is shocking that the CITB board contains only one representative from an SME construction firm. Furthermore, this individual is a human resources professional rather than someone with an SME contractor background.
“Given that SME firms make up 98% of the construction industry and train two-thirds of all apprentices, the FMB wants to see this reflected at board level with at least half of its members being SME contractor representatives.
“If we get the governance structure right, the CITB will automatically start to better reflect the needs of small construction firms.”
In a recent survey of FMB members, 61% said that the CITB would become more effective if it ensured the majority of representatives on the CITB board were from small or micro construction firms.
“It is the FMB’s understanding that a recommendation to increase SME representation on the CITB board will also be reflected in the government’s ITB Review which is expected to be published in October 2017,” added Berry.
He added that the FMB was also seeking simplification of the grant scheme and that too few SME levy payers are claiming back CITB grants and this is because the process is too complicated and bureaucratic.
Last week the Civil Engineering Contractors Association (CECA) announced its overwhelming support for continuation of the CITB.
Comments are closed.