Balfour Beatty has made a U-turn in its decision to vote against the CITB and now intends to support the retention of the body.
Last month, chief executive Leo Quinn said that Balfour would be voting against the renewal of the CITB’s levy mandate.
Quinn said the CITB had shown itself incapable of delivering the workforce the construction industry needs.
However, since then, Balfour Beatty has held a number of meetings with the CITB and has changed its mind.
In a statement, the company said: “The CITB has now provided Balfour Beatty with appropriate assurances and preliminary details about the reforms. It has demonstrated that it understands the urgency and magnitude of change necessary to create a CITB which will better meet the needs of the UK construction industry and help create the skilled workforce necessary to deliver the enormous pipeline of planned works.
“Balfour Beatty believes that further work on the governance of the CITB is necessary. We are willing to work constructively, with the CITB and our industry partners, to ensure that the CITB has governance which is fit for purpose as soon as is practical.
Related stories
- CITB chief executive: ‘There is a future for us’
- CLC and BAM Nuttall chief executive backs CITB
- Balfour Beatty’s Quinn quits CLC
“It is unsatisfactory that the vote on the Consensus is taking place before full publication of the reform plans. This has meant that industry has had to vote without having the detail it needs to make an informed decision.
“Nonetheless, in light of the assurances received from the CITB and its management Balfour Beatty has decided to vote in favour of the consensus to enable the CITB to rapidly deliver on these commitments.”
Sarah Beale, chief executive of CITB, said: “We welcome today’s announcement from Balfour Beatty and agree that CITB’s reforms must make us more accountable to industry.
“Our discussions with Balfour Beatty reflect how we want to go forward with industry, with open lines of communication and agreed outcomes. There is no doubt change needs to happen. All levy payers should know that we are listening to them and will adapt to support their needs now and in the future.”
Comments are closed.