The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) has decided to pressure the International Union of Architects (UIA) to suspend Israel’s architectural body on the grounds that it is doing nothing to resist Israeli construction on illegally-occupied Palestinian land.
The RIBA Council vote on 19 March passed with 23 in favour, 16 against, and 10 abstentions.
The strongly-worded motion, proposed by RIBA’s Immediate Past President, Angela Brady, said: “Since the Israeli Association of United Architects (IAUA) has paid no regard to the UIA resolution 13 of 2005 and 2009, the RIBA calls on the UIA, as the international guardian of professional and ethical standards in our profession, to suspend the membership of the Israeli Association of United Architects, until it acts to resist these illegal projects, and observes international law, and the UIA Accords and Resolution 13.”
Angela Brady is pushing for IAUA to be suspended from the International Union of Architects
Resolution 13 of the UIA, whose members include professional bodies from 124 countries, states: “The UIA Council condemns development projects and the construction of buildings on land that has been ethnically purified or illegally appropriated, and projects based on regulations that are ethnically or culturally discriminatory, and similarly it condemns all action contravening the fourth Geneva Convention.”
Dissenting RIBA Council members are reported to have pointed to human rights violations in other parts of the world, such as North Korea, also a member of the UIA.
Speaking for the IAUA, Prof Baruch Baruch said the RIBA’s decision was “astonishing”, according to The Guardian newspaper.
“I don’t think architects can be blamed for government policies,” he said, adding that the IAUA, which includes Israeli-Arab architects, was not complicit in settlement construction.
“A lot of members are against settlements and building in the West Bank,” he said. “They won’t be helped by a boycott.”
But Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine (APJP) praised Brady and RIBA’s decision. Its chairman, Abe Hayeem, an RIBA member, said 2013 was a record year in new settlement construction in the occupied West Bank, and he accused the IAUA of showing “complete detachment and refusal to act on or condemn” the activity.
In a statement he said that “the whole real-estate enterprise is closely tied in with Israel’s political and military agenda to grab and hold as much land as possible, denying a fully sovereign Palestinian state”.
Comments
Comments are closed.
What arrogance. If the RIBA pursue this, they must surely expect a rigorous examination of the involvement of their own members on projects throughout the world.
Israel as a nation is far from perfect. However, it is the most democratic nation within the region. Taking such action against Israel is ill informed and narrow minded. If you are going to boycott Israel do it properly but be prepared to send yourself back to the dark ages and get rid of a lot of your technology, medicines and medical equipment to name a few which were all developed by Israel and shared with the world. Also be prepared as the report suggests to act against other countries with far worse human rights records. The West Bank is indeed occupied but not by Israel. It is occupied by Arabs from a number of surrounding countries who should have been part of Jordan, itself formed by land taken from Israel. If anything Gaza, the West Bank and Jordan should be under full Israeli control. The various ethnic groups, Arabs etc receive more benefits as Israeli citizens as they would in their own native countries from the region. A Palestinian state is a nonsense. There is no such thing as a Palestinian. The name was given to the area by the Romans as an insult to the Jews as it referred to the Philistines, a race long extinct. For a long time Israel was Palestine and the Jews called Palestinians. The RIBA need to think long and hard about taking such a position.