News

London needs modular housing revolution 

Story for CM? Get in touch via email: [email protected]

Comments

  1. Modular construction has been talked about for decades, and many attempts have been made. In my opinion, the only one with any degree of success was the immediate post-war prefab. scheme, which was essentially plonking a load of bungalows in a field or a bomb site. The principle does not easily translate to high-density urban sites where there will nearly always be a need for a degree of customisation to suit local conditions, thereby nibbling away at the principle of standardisation. It would be more useful to have a factory manufacturing process with the flexibility and adaptability to produce a variety of different designs, rather than trying to impose uniformity.

  2. In an assignment for a major college near Reading that trains Surveyors, I had to seriously question the value of modular build compared to traditional, and was marked down heavily for doing so.

    Sure, it is faster, and he quality is higher, and it may be cheaper. But traditional building stock is also maintainable.

    Past experiences of modular build types that have reached their end of life, suggest that when it does happen, it is scrap them and start again.

    Is that really what we want as the basis of the housing market, a large stock of buildings needing to be replaced every 30 years, or sooner?

Comments are closed.

Latest articles in News