Image: Dreamstime
Underqualified workers present a continued fire risk in the construction of buildings, the Electrical Contractors Association (ECA) has warned.
The ECA warned of the risk of further residential fire tragedies following the publication earlier this week of the report into the first phase of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.
It cautioned that “several inquiries” have concluded that installer competency is fundamental to public safety, particularly in the case of residential tower blocks, care homes and hospitals.
And it claimed that within the electrotechnical industry, “many individuals are claiming to be competent electricians despite having trained, in some cases, for only a matter of weeks”.
ECA director of corporate and social responsibility Paul Reeve said: “This week’s publication of the inquiry findings into the Grenfell tragedy underline the urgency and vital importance of ensuring that everyone who works in and on buildings, where there are vulnerable residents, must be sufficiently competent.
“We should all remember we are talking about ensuring residential fire safety. It’s time to stop messing around with low levels of electrical and fire safety competency, and in particular it’s high time to say a final goodbye to so-called ‘five-week wonders’ – wrongly regarded by some as competent to design and install electrical work in residential and similar premises.
“ECA has mapped the way forward for our sector in our response – we need to avoid settling for lower competencies, which risks another major fire tragedy in the UK.”
The ECA has set out a series of recommendations regarding the competency of installers in the ‘Raising the Bar’ consultation, which was prepared by the Steering Group on Competence for ‘Building a Safety Future’ in response to the Grenfell Tower tragedy. The recommendations are:
- All enterprises should have accredited third-party certification
- All individuals must have Level 2 or 3 Ofqual-regulated and competence-based qualifications. ECA strongly advocates technical apprenticeships for new entrants
- The electrotechnical sector should use the Electrotechnical Certification card Scheme (ECS)
- CPD should ensure workers are up-to-date with the latest regulations and other developments
- All installers should have core, relevant knowledge of fire safety in buildings, with standardised and mandatory training
Comments
Comments are closed.
Why are under-qualified workers there in the first place. There should be no under-qualified workers on site, that rule is not new it has been in place for a long time
Unfortunately the 5 week courses have been understood in my opinion. The kitchen fitters and plumbers etc that already carried out minor electrical works need the extra tuition to give them competence in carrying out works eg change a switch cover add 1 socket . Move a light etc. But the 5WW is now seen as a route to being classed as a competent electrician. ( not just domestic as ment to be) like every system it is open to misinterpretation and manipulation and sadly this has happened leading to thousands of 5WW sparks now claiming to be electricians. The NICEIC,NAPIT etc have to look at this as it is them that are saying these guys are competent domestic installers they need to be clear install what ? I certainly wouldn’t want a 5WW to design and rewire my house or even change a board but these things are now common practice for Domestic installers