In recent years, construction has put on its best clothes and gone back to school with its head held high. The industry offers something for everyone. If you’re looking for a hands-on, outdoor job it’s impossible to take home, construction’s for you. If you want professional status, to make a difference and a good salary, construction’s for you. If you’re creative, innovative, a free-thinker or a problem solver, construction’s for you.
Thanks to the efforts of hundreds of construction companies and their staff, that message is increasingly being heard in schools across the UK. Often, one-off visits or longer-term partnering arrangements form part of a Corporate Social Responsibility agenda, monitored and audited as part of a business’s “social footprint”. With the Social Value Act adding impetus to an already growing trend, schools and construction are in closer contact than ever before.
Read related article
Which is all great… but. Are we prioritising the schools next to major sites, or the contractor’s HQ, and leaving others untouched? How do we track which schools have had exposure to construction, and which have been ignored? And when a school is the beneficiary of a targeted effort, is it better to focus it shallow and wide, or narrow and deep? Should we address the 11-14-year-olds en masse, or the 15-16-year-olds who are undecided about their A-level options?
The answer, of course, is that different approaches will work best in different circumstances, and that the schools themselves are often in the best place to judge what will benefit their students. But when the industry’s approach to schools engagement is as much CSR-led as schools-led, there’s a danger that message and audience are mismatched and resources miss their target. To wake young people up to the opportunities that construction offers, there surely needs to be more coordination, more tailoring and more scale.
Looking at how schools engagement works in other sectors, the phenomenon of STEMNet stands out. It is funded by the Department for Education and BIS to put 28,000 STEM ambassadors into 90% of UK secondary schools. Its reach and impact – independently audited and measured – is equally impressive.
A Construction 2025 group is due to publish its recommendations on how the industry can get “more bang for its buck” in schools engagement. The answers, surely, have to involve asking employers to back just a few of the many worthwhile programmes out there, to communicate what they’re doing to a coordinator tasked with tracking what’s happening, and commissioning a study to evaluate what generates most impact. The industry’s future workforce depends on it.
Elaine Knutt, editor
Comments
Comments are closed.
Are we missing a trick? The current work done by many contractors in engaging with schools is laudable and no doubt somewhat productive. But ……. by the time contractors get to speak to Comprehensive School children the die is almost always already cast – if we want our young people to be “inspired to aspire” then we perhaps should be sowing the seeds of our great industry into primary level children. Give them a taste for the industry, from labourer to professional managers and set them on a timeline of being inspired to aspire to our great industry before the legacy of their past or family background sets them on a different path. Children need to be enthused, to be given guidelines to a rewarding career and you can’t start that process too early.