Construction Management is the highest circulation construction-based publication serving the UK built environment.
News
Cladding removal funds ‘not sufficient’, MPs warn
The government’s recently announced £1bn Building Safety Fund to remove combustible non-ACM cladding from buildings above 18m will only cover a third of the 1,700 buildings that require remediation, MPs have warned.
The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
warned that support would fall “far short” of what was needed to carry out
remedial work on buildings that have dangerous cladding or other fire safety
issues, including inadequate fire doors or missing fire breaks.
It criticised “stringent rules” on applying to the £1bn
non-ACM cladding fund, including a short application window and restrictions
against social housing providers.
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
And it urged the government to make an “absolute commitment”
to ensure that all buildings of any height with ACM cladding should be fully remediated
of all fire safety defects by December 2021.
Buildings with other forms of dangerous cladding should have
all fire safety defects removed by June 2022, it added. Meanwhile, it called on
the government to accept that its £1bn fund was “insufficient” and meet the
cost necessary to make the buildings safe.
And the committee suggested that rather than the taxpayer being
expected to cover all costs, the government should seek to recover costs on
individual buildings from those responsible and be prepared to take legal
action.
Committee chair Clive Betts said: “It is clear that the £1bn
Building Safety Fund will not be enough. Too many risk being excluded by the
criteria for accessing this support and the amount of money pledged is only
enough to cover a fraction of the work needed. The fund should be increased so
that it is enough to cover the amount of work that is actually needed, both to
remove cladding a resolve wider fire safety concerns. Further support must also
be provided for the costs of stop-gap safety measures, such as ‘waking
watches’, to reduce the burden on homeowners.
“This should not just be a question of the government, and
therefore the taxpayer, stepping in with a blank cheque. Those who have caused,
and in some cases refuse to rectify, safety issues must be made to pay. We call
on the government to consider taking legal action to recover the cost of works
on individual buildings. Compulsory Purchase Order powers should be used to
take direct ownership of buildings where owners have failed to begin remedial
work by December 2020.
“It is time for the government to commit to end the scourge
of dangerous cladding once and for all. A piecemeal approach that will see
homeowners facing many more years of stress and financial hardship. This is not
an option.”
Slow progress on ACM remediation continues
Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
A total of 300 high-rise residential and publicly owned
buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations still
haven’t been remediated in England.
That’s according to the latest update from the government’s Building Safety Programme, running up to 31 May 2020. A total of 155 buildings have now completed remediation works. Another 54 have had their ACM cladding systems removed.
As of 31 May, the Social Sector ACM Cladding Remediation
Fund approved £270m of funding for the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM.
The Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund has
approved £33m for the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM.
The January/February 2026 issue of Construction Management magazine is now available to read in digital format.
Powered Access
CM, in partnership with IPAF, has launched a new survey to explore the industry’s views and experiences with powered access machines on construction projects.
This is not a first step towards a paywall. We need readers to register with us to help sustain creation of quality editorial content on Construction Management. Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings. Thank you.
