Opinion

Can our existing workforce close the construction skills gap?

Story for CM? Get in touch via email: [email protected]

Comments

  1. In view of current safety issues can we continue to operate sites with no common written and spoken language. Often a contractual requirement in oil/gas and power contracts and not covered in many of our standard forms as they stem from a period when it wasn’t an issue. We could, as certain other countries, ration/licence the work to ensure full or near full employment for the indigenous population.

    Surely this should be aired and discussed

  2. I’ve found in Architecture that CPD is something that happens at lunch, when some CPD provider or other needs to flog a product. Other than that, it is something that no employer is prepared to pay for, or encourage, as it only ends up with staff leaving and taking their skills with them. Firms that do a lot of commercial work also take a commercial viewpoint, that they can always buy in more skills when they need them. That they won’t have them in existing staff, and that it may be a problem…well it isn’t on their radar. Staff of course also know that they’ll be paid the same regardless of how much or how little they do, so generally don’t bother either.

    That said, it hasn’t stopped me, as my last study, a PG Dip through CEM (now UCEM), led to me leaving my last job, moving overseas and doubling my income. I’m now saving each year not far off what I was earning after tax before.

    I’m now keeping that urge to learn going, and am in the UCEM Masters of Quantity Surveying Course.

    It’s intriguing for an Architect, as they cover quite a lot that Architects should know but in my experience usually don’t.

Comments are closed.

Latest articles in Opinion